We've had privatized fire and police services in the US. The government took over because private services failed to provide fully for the public good.
Yet, privatized security forces provide some of the best protection umbrellas in American urban centers; see the University of Chicago security or the University of Pennsylvania's. While I am not a libertarian, there is a stark difference between a city sub–contracting its police force, and truly privatized security as seen on campuses, businesses or even some neighborhoods. I don't think privatization is an answer for law–enforcement and procedure, but it is superior for security.
A truly private fire service would either be a public risk or as prone to free–riding as any tax–based system. Not really much of a solution, just a moral band–aid for the group of libertarians who are such because of a belief that taxation in itself is theft.
Every time I see a Brinks truck hauling money, I remember: it was Brinks security men who shot union protestors and organizers. Yes, private companies do provide excellent security, but I don't think we need private militaries.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 02:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 04:05 pm (UTC)A truly private fire service would either be a public risk or as prone to free–riding as any tax–based system. Not really much of a solution, just a moral band–aid for the group of libertarians who are such because of a belief that taxation in itself is theft.
no subject
Date: 2011-09-23 04:21 pm (UTC)