Date: 2007-02-26 05:20 pm (UTC)
well come now, the Gospel of Thomas is a
collection of sayings of Jesus rather than
a narrative...does it not make sense that people
wrote down Jesus sayings ,as I made notes on
L Reid's lecture the other day and presented
an approximation of what he said, and then
formed them into collections which in turn were
used as sources by the authors of the Gospels--
perhaps in some cases the same persons who had
made the collections?
and how does that reduce the authority of the thing?
it does mean that we do not probably always have
exact words, obvious anyway when we are given two
versions with verbal difference by two evangelists...
we have what we are inteded to have is the sufficient
I should think answer, as St John says not everything
but a verbal icon of the life of the Lord etc.

well people draw the lines in the sand at different
places and it is not wrong...I recall a discussion with
[livejournal.com profile] goldhands who sadly seems to be writing less
where you expressed similar strong dissent from this
criticism.
But at least at this point does not the collection of
sayings make sense to one?
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

alpharaposa: (Default)
alpharaposa

January 2023

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
29 3031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 4th, 2025 08:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios