alpharaposa: (Default)
alpharaposa ([personal profile] alpharaposa) wrote2009-06-14 12:05 am

(no subject)

  • 13:00 @mcahogarth Well, what would a human with no internal skeleton and chitinous skin look like? #
  • 13:03 @mcahogarth Don't forget that insects breathe through tube openings either in their sides or feet. #
  • 13:03 @mcahogarth Insects are small because the exchange medium takes up too much space at large sizes; no lungs, just tubes. #
  • 13:08 @mcahogarth Of course, since there's no internal skeleton, all you're left with to hang things around is figuring out how the muscles work #
Automatically shipped by LoudTwitter

[identity profile] kishiriadgr.livejournal.com 2009-06-14 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
I'm left thinking of the condition popularly known as "harlequin baby" in which the infant is born with scarlet eyes and a thick, scaly skin. It's quite gruesome and seems to be a throwback to our days as fishies.

[identity profile] that-guy-zach.livejournal.com 2009-06-14 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
"Well, what would a human with no internal skeleton and chitinous skin look like?"

Nancy Pelosi?

[identity profile] aefenglommung.livejournal.com 2009-06-14 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)
If you're concerned with how large insects (or insectoids) could realistically get, don't forget that in prehistoric times, there were six-foot dragonflies with humongous wingspans and other giants about.